What is Forensic Psychiatry? with Mark Levy

Join us for an intriguing discussion on the connection between law and human behavior with Dr. Mark, a distinguished forensic psychiatry specialist. I'm Adam, your host, and in this episode, we explore forensic psychiatry—a medical field that bridges...
Join us for an intriguing discussion on the connection between law and human behavior with Dr. Mark, a distinguished forensic psychiatry specialist. I'm Adam, your host, and in this episode, we explore forensic psychiatry—a medical field that bridges legal systems and mental health. Dr. Mark explains the differences between treating psychiatrists and forensic psychiatric experts in the legal field. We discuss mental health assessments in legal contexts, psychiatric training evolution, and challenges of presenting evidence in court. Dr. Mark highlights the advantages of diverse group practice. Discover the crucial role of forensic psychiatry in the justice system and the need for effective communication and holistic mental health.
Keywords:
Forensic Psychiatry - Human Behavior - Legal Systems - Mental Health - Psychiatric Training - Legal Contexts - Psychiatric Evidence - Anthropology - Podcast - Essay - Group Practice - Justice System - Effective Communication - Holistic Health - Law Psychiatry - Forensic Expert - Mental Assessments - Medical Evolution - Psychiatry
Follow This Anthro Life:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/this-anthro-life/
https://www.thisanthrolife.org/
https://thisanthrolife.substack.com/
https://www.facebook.com/thisanthrolife
https://www.instagram.com/thisanthrolife/
Contac Mark Levy:
https://fpamed.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-levy-md-83538213/
1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:06.879
Cultural altitudes have certainly changed in my
fifty year career. Homosexuality has moved from
2
00:00:06.919 --> 00:00:14.480
being listed as a mental disorder in
the Diagnosticatistical Manual to gay marriage. That's
3
00:00:14.519 --> 00:00:19.600
a huge social transition. In the
same period that that, thank Goodness has
4
00:00:19.839 --> 00:00:25.640
evolved, that our social thinking about
choice of people to love has evolved,
5
00:00:26.320 --> 00:00:39.320
Worthy Wade has gone backwards. Welcome
to the Santhra Life. We're curiosity Sparks,
6
00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:42.880
dialogue and dialogue sparks change. I'm
your host, Adam Ganwell. Today's
7
00:00:42.880 --> 00:00:47.520
episode, we're diving into the fascinating
intersection of psychiatry and the justice system with
8
00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:51.719
doctor Mark Levy, a leading forensic
psychiatrist, as a trailblazer who navigates the
9
00:00:51.759 --> 00:00:56.280
complex pathways between how we understand mental
health now it's interpreted in the courtroom.
10
00:00:56.439 --> 00:01:00.880
Doctor Levy brings a perspective that's both
enlightening and essential his insights into how subtle
11
00:01:00.920 --> 00:01:03.400
nuances and human behavior can swing the
scales of justice. We'll leave you with
12
00:01:03.480 --> 00:01:07.599
a new view on the deep connections
between our minds and the laws that govern
13
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:11.280
society. This is an episode that
you don't want to miss. Stay tuned.
14
00:01:11.760 --> 00:01:14.480
Awesome, So just want to to
kick off and say, Mark,
15
00:01:14.519 --> 00:01:17.840
really excited to have you on the
podcast today and excited to dive on in.
16
00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:21.079
So thank you for joining me today, thank you for inviting me.
17
00:01:21.079 --> 00:01:23.959
It's good to be here. Awesome. So to kick us off, there's
18
00:01:23.959 --> 00:01:27.319
there's kind of two you know words
in terms of framing how you do your
19
00:01:27.319 --> 00:01:32.319
work. You know, forensic in
psychiatry that oftentimes people may not think about
20
00:01:32.359 --> 00:01:34.000
as going together, you know,
very frequently it's kind of a maybe a
21
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:38.760
new area area for some folks.
So can you kind of kick us off
22
00:01:38.799 --> 00:01:41.879
by giving us a sense of this, like what is what is forensic psychiatry
23
00:01:41.959 --> 00:01:44.719
as a as a as a frame
and as a field, as a discipline,
24
00:01:45.120 --> 00:01:47.079
and then let's dive into your story
about how you got into that in
25
00:01:47.079 --> 00:01:52.359
the first place. Sure, that's
a good place to start. Forensic psychiatry
26
00:01:52.640 --> 00:02:01.480
actually what has been done for probably
centuries, but it's not being recognized or
27
00:02:01.519 --> 00:02:09.000
even a trained area of medicine.
But because psychiatry deals with human behavior and
28
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:15.800
the law deals with human behavior,
there have been instances when psychiatrists have been
29
00:02:15.319 --> 00:02:24.599
called into court to offer opinions,
particularly in criminal matters. But today forensic
30
00:02:24.599 --> 00:02:31.360
psychiatry is probably one of the newest
medical subspecialties. It is in fact the
31
00:02:31.400 --> 00:02:39.639
only area of medicine where there is
a fellowship trading and board certification. Even
32
00:02:39.680 --> 00:02:49.680
though doctors from all specialties can be
called upon in legal matters, in particularly
33
00:02:49.719 --> 00:02:53.479
to testify in court when their specialty
is called in the question. You know,
34
00:02:53.639 --> 00:03:05.080
somebody is suing about a complication of
a delivery, then obstetricians are very
35
00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:10.479
important to educate the court. That's
the judge or the trier of fact,
36
00:03:10.759 --> 00:03:15.800
which is usually the jury unless it's
just what's called the bench trial of it
37
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:22.439
just a judge. The experts necessary
to educate them about the specific issues in
38
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:31.680
the obstetric that come to bear on
the issues that's in dispute. But in
39
00:03:31.840 --> 00:03:38.120
general, because psychiatry deals with human
behavior, there is a much wider range
40
00:03:38.199 --> 00:03:45.759
where psychiatric expertise is all upon.
So there's a big difference between a treating
41
00:03:45.800 --> 00:03:53.400
psychiatrist and a forensic psychiatric experts.
And I can summarize pretty quickly what the
42
00:03:53.479 --> 00:04:00.759
difference is. And I wear both
hats, but never both hats, never
43
00:04:00.840 --> 00:04:05.960
two hats with the same person.
That is, I'm a treater and I'm
44
00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:14.639
also a forensic psychiatric expert. But
I would never be the independent expert for
45
00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:19.319
a patient whom I'm treating, nor
would I take a plaintiff who I am
46
00:04:19.519 --> 00:04:25.319
the independent expert about and make them
my patient, because they are all kinds
47
00:04:25.399 --> 00:04:33.759
of role distinctions and even ethical complications. So in a nutshell, the role
48
00:04:33.920 --> 00:04:39.439
distinction is this. Let me just
say before I get into this. Forensic
49
00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:46.199
psychiatry is the interface of law and
psychiatry, and in some respects it goes
50
00:04:46.399 --> 00:04:53.759
very easily, but in some respects
it's quite different because medical terms and legal
51
00:04:53.839 --> 00:05:00.839
terms are not identical or even interchangeable. A good example is uh, not
52
00:05:00.959 --> 00:05:09.720
guilty by reason of insanity, and
this is a decision that's made usually in
53
00:05:09.759 --> 00:05:15.199
a murder case when someone doesn't appreciate
the wrongfulness of their act because of a
54
00:05:15.319 --> 00:05:21.920
mental illness. But insanity is not
a medical term. It doesn't equate to
55
00:05:21.959 --> 00:05:28.560
psychosis. It's a legal term.
It's defined in case law and it's defined
56
00:05:28.600 --> 00:05:34.199
in statute. So one of the
roles of forensic psychiatry is a translation role.
57
00:05:34.839 --> 00:05:41.319
And just like translating between languages,
there aren't always identical words in two
58
00:05:41.360 --> 00:05:45.199
different languages, So you have to
get clothes. That's an approximation, but
59
00:05:45.319 --> 00:05:49.319
it's not. It's not equivalent necessarily, and certainly on a nuanced basis not
60
00:05:49.439 --> 00:05:59.480
equivalent. So forensics psychiatry, like
the law, is divided between criminal and
61
00:05:59.560 --> 00:06:03.279
civil. And if you'd like,
I could talk about that later, but
62
00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:12.000
I wanted to make this distinction between
the roles. The treating psychiatrist and the
63
00:06:12.040 --> 00:06:20.839
independent forensic psychiatric expert have entirely different
missions, methods, and ethical duties.
64
00:06:21.920 --> 00:06:29.399
There's a huge distinction between these roles. The mission of a treating doctor under
65
00:06:29.399 --> 00:06:34.800
the Hippocratic is to alleviate suffering,
and and that's why people come to a
66
00:06:34.879 --> 00:06:41.680
doctor physically or mentally their suffering and
they want some help and relief from the
67
00:06:41.720 --> 00:06:50.399
pain. The method of a treating
psychiatrist is to rely almost entirely on their
68
00:06:50.480 --> 00:06:57.319
patient's subjective self report. There are
exceptions to that, but generally, if
69
00:06:57.360 --> 00:07:01.240
a patient comes in and TELP me. Patient comes to me, and as
70
00:07:01.279 --> 00:07:05.000
part of my taking their history,
they tell me that their father beats them.
71
00:07:05.399 --> 00:07:11.600
I accept that. I don't go
and interview family members to determine is
72
00:07:11.639 --> 00:07:17.040
this objectively true or is this sort
of slightly off based, is this completely
73
00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:23.879
wrong? I accept that with the
exception that if someone comes in who's psychotic
74
00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:28.199
and tells me that the television talking
to them that is so far out of
75
00:07:28.199 --> 00:07:34.720
our consensual reality that I know this
isn't necessarily objectively accurate, although this is
76
00:07:34.759 --> 00:07:41.480
their subjective experience, and the ethical
duty of a treating doctor, also under
77
00:07:41.480 --> 00:07:46.839
the Hippocratic oath, is to do
what the doctor feels is in their patient's
78
00:07:46.879 --> 00:07:54.439
best interest. In the Hippocratic oath, it comes from a Latin phrase,
79
00:07:54.519 --> 00:08:00.800
but it translates into first dudento harm. But the application of that is you
80
00:08:01.360 --> 00:08:05.759
do what you think is going to
be helpful to this person. In contrast,
81
00:08:07.759 --> 00:08:13.879
the mission of the forensic expert is
to determine what is objectively true as
82
00:08:13.959 --> 00:08:20.519
best as possible. The gold bully
On standard is the ballistics expert who says
83
00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:24.920
the shell came from the gun or
it didn't. It's much more difficult in
84
00:08:26.000 --> 00:08:31.879
behavioral medicine than it is in ballistics. Not to understate how difficult it may
85
00:08:31.879 --> 00:08:39.879
be in ballistics, but that's the
gold bully On standard, and the method
86
00:08:39.720 --> 00:08:46.960
is entirely different because, particularly in
outpatients psychiatry, a treating doctor, as
87
00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:54.720
I said, relies on their patients
subjective self report in they don't even it's
88
00:08:54.879 --> 00:09:01.000
very rare for a treating a treating
psychiatrist to get medical records on their patient,
89
00:09:01.480 --> 00:09:09.159
let alone request outside psychological testing to
help determine their diagnose. It happens,
90
00:09:09.159 --> 00:09:13.480
but it's rare. It's not the
rule at all. In forensic psychiatry,
91
00:09:15.120 --> 00:09:20.679
you want to see all available data, so that's years of medical records
92
00:09:20.080 --> 00:09:28.399
on the person you are examining.
We always get a forensic psychologist or forensic
93
00:09:28.559 --> 00:09:35.600
neuropsychologist if there are clear brain issues
like a traumatic brain injury or someone has
94
00:09:35.679 --> 00:09:45.480
dementia, and that's very objective data. We get all depositions that Those are
95
00:09:46.120 --> 00:09:50.759
transcriptions of under oath interviews that are
taken as part of a legal process,
96
00:09:50.879 --> 00:09:58.360
usually in civil matters, and in
a sense they are elaborate witness interviews or
97
00:09:58.360 --> 00:10:05.080
interviews of the plaintiff under oath by
usually opposing counsel with their own council present,
98
00:10:05.879 --> 00:10:11.080
and we read those and other legal
documents. You know, there may
99
00:10:11.120 --> 00:10:16.039
be a police report in a criminal
matter. There may be employment records in
100
00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:24.159
a civil employment issue where somebody's alleging
they've been discriminated against or harassed or wrongfully
101
00:10:24.279 --> 00:10:33.559
terminated and then we do a multi
hour interview of the plaintiff in the civil
102
00:10:33.639 --> 00:10:37.759
matter or the defendant in a criminal
matter. And although that is by definition
103
00:10:37.840 --> 00:10:43.399
their subjective self report, it's very
important to see not only what they say,
104
00:10:46.120 --> 00:10:50.159
but the way that they say it. And that's a big difference between
105
00:10:50.440 --> 00:10:56.440
the deposition, which is a formal
interview with all kinds of rules of how
106
00:10:56.840 --> 00:11:01.600
what can be asked and how it
can be asked, and a psychiatric interview,
107
00:11:01.279 --> 00:11:09.519
which often goes although we cover many
areas that we need to cover,
108
00:11:09.960 --> 00:11:15.360
you know, let's say the person's
history, their childhood, their relationship history,
109
00:11:15.519 --> 00:11:20.799
their employment history, et cetera.
Our method is more of an associative
110
00:11:20.960 --> 00:11:24.559
method. So somebody you ask,
somebody you know, tell me about yourself,
111
00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:28.799
open ended questions, and then you
take it from there and see what
112
00:11:28.840 --> 00:11:33.639
they pick up and tell you about
and ask questions about that and circle back
113
00:11:33.679 --> 00:11:41.039
and fill in blanks. And the
ethical duty of the forensic psychiatrist is not
114
00:11:41.279 --> 00:11:48.159
to the plaintiff, even if they
are retained by the plaintiff's council. It
115
00:11:48.240 --> 00:11:54.320
is to the trier of fact,
and that's the person or the people who
116
00:11:54.399 --> 00:11:58.240
decide who weigh the facts and decide
what is true and what is not.
117
00:12:00.279 --> 00:12:03.879
A jury and a jury trial,
there are bench trials where there's just a
118
00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:07.440
judge doing it. That's to whom
we owe a duty. We have a
119
00:12:07.519 --> 00:12:13.159
fiduciary duty to the attorney who has
retained us. But our job is to
120
00:12:13.200 --> 00:12:18.320
be is to call balls and strikes
as we see them, and to support
121
00:12:18.360 --> 00:12:24.000
it with evidence, not just the
authority that I've done this for so many
122
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:28.960
decades, therefore it's true. But
here's the evidence that I have found that
123
00:12:28.039 --> 00:12:35.320
supports this. So those are the
distinctions, and frequently I might say one
124
00:12:35.320 --> 00:12:39.919
another thing. There are fewer than
two thousand board certified forensic psychiatrists. To
125
00:12:41.039 --> 00:12:46.120
become board certified, you have to, after a psychiatrist, do a full
126
00:12:46.200 --> 00:12:52.159
time one year fellowship in law on
psychiatry. There are seventy thousand board certified
127
00:12:52.200 --> 00:13:01.159
psychiatrists. Many psychiatrists who are not
trained in forensic psychiatry, UH put themselves
128
00:13:01.200 --> 00:13:07.240
out there to be retained as forensic
experts, and they don't understand their role
129
00:13:07.360 --> 00:13:11.919
distinctions. They end up being advocate, which is the lawyer's job. You
130
00:13:11.960 --> 00:13:18.120
know, they their advocate or abused
children or their advocates were you know,
131
00:13:18.200 --> 00:13:24.080
worthy causes, but it's a real
corruption and misunderstanding and unfortunately for many of
132
00:13:24.120 --> 00:13:28.840
them, well of potholes that they
step into because they don't really understand the
133
00:13:28.919 --> 00:13:33.720
landscape. That's that's an interesting challenge
point though, because oftentimes on the to
134
00:13:33.759 --> 00:13:37.480
your point, like when you think
about the distinction of the roles they're on
135
00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:41.360
the kind of treating psychiatrists doctor role, you have some kind of feeling of
136
00:13:41.519 --> 00:13:43.879
advocacy right for you your patient.
You want to kind of get their subjective,
137
00:13:43.879 --> 00:13:46.200
real view and help them kind of
work through those problems. But interestingly,
138
00:13:46.240 --> 00:13:50.399
like on the forensic law side here
you're saying, it's that we're not
139
00:13:50.519 --> 00:13:54.080
here to advocate, where we're here
to sort of determine what are the what
140
00:13:54.120 --> 00:13:58.159
are the facts at play, and
let them let those then pass on to
141
00:13:58.240 --> 00:14:01.360
the adjudicating body. That's an interesting, interesting kind of thing to know,
142
00:14:01.399 --> 00:14:03.679
because I think something else that's interesting
there. We said there's this kind of
143
00:14:03.679 --> 00:14:07.519
seventy thousand certified psychiatrists out there,
right, but I think there's many fewer
144
00:14:09.039 --> 00:14:11.919
certified forensic psychiatrists, right. It's
a much much like what's what's the different
145
00:14:11.960 --> 00:14:16.039
the different number there? We have
seventy thousand certified psychiatrists. Yeah, fewer
146
00:14:16.039 --> 00:14:20.440
than two thousand. But let me
just pick up what you said, because
147
00:14:22.320 --> 00:14:28.840
you're correct. A treating doctor is
an advocate for their patient, rightly so,
148
00:14:30.759 --> 00:14:35.639
and sometimes a treating doctor needs to
be called into a legal process.
149
00:14:37.080 --> 00:14:43.279
Most treating doctors hate it, and
they they regard being deposed as an opportunity
150
00:14:43.279 --> 00:14:48.320
to be humiliated. And it's really
doctors in general avoid litigation like the plague
151
00:14:50.000 --> 00:14:54.480
because it's scary and they don't know, they don't understand it. But it's
152
00:14:54.519 --> 00:15:01.840
okay to testify as the treating doctor. But you are what in the legal
153
00:15:01.960 --> 00:15:07.639
terminology is a precipient witness. You're
a witness. Your point of view is
154
00:15:07.279 --> 00:15:13.360
defined as subjective, and within that
context you can advocate for what you think
155
00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:18.360
is in your patient's best interest.
But you're not an independent expert. You
156
00:15:18.399 --> 00:15:22.720
may be an expert in your field, but you're not an independent expert.
157
00:15:22.039 --> 00:15:28.919
And that's the important distinction. And
when the doctors say the psychiatrists who don't
158
00:15:28.000 --> 00:15:35.440
have training in forensic psychiatry all for
themselves as independent experts, invariably they're doing
159
00:15:35.480 --> 00:15:41.679
it from the mindset of being a
treating doctor. And therefore it seems quite
160
00:15:41.799 --> 00:15:48.039
natural to them to advocate. But
in a stude attorney, certainly a cross
161
00:15:48.159 --> 00:15:54.960
examining attorney who's been down this road
or who is being coached by a forensic
162
00:15:54.000 --> 00:16:03.639
psychiatrist who he or she has retained, can really destroy their credibility when they
163
00:16:03.679 --> 00:16:10.159
do that. Which is the problem
in testimony is if you get caught in
164
00:16:10.279 --> 00:16:17.600
one instance of finessing your answer,
not to mention lying, but just finessing
165
00:16:17.639 --> 00:16:25.120
it. In litigation attorneys, that's
like blood in the water and a pool
166
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:30.960
of sharks. You get devoured because
of that lack that one answer that was
167
00:16:32.720 --> 00:16:37.759
shady, and everything that you said
loses its credibility. So that's when you
168
00:16:37.840 --> 00:16:44.039
practice in this area. It's very
important to stay within the guardrails. This
169
00:16:44.120 --> 00:16:47.879
is my area of expertise. This
I know is I have the evidence at
170
00:16:47.919 --> 00:16:52.840
the court and sometimes attorneys will try
to pull you out of that. But
171
00:16:52.360 --> 00:16:56.159
doctor, you know you you're a
psychiatrist, but you're an MD, aren't
172
00:16:56.200 --> 00:17:00.919
you? What do you think about
this hysterectomy that was done? Never answer
173
00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:04.039
that I'm not an ob gyn.
I'm a psychiatrist. Yes, I'm a
174
00:17:04.079 --> 00:17:08.640
physician. You need a ob guyn
to answer that question. That's interesting.
175
00:17:08.680 --> 00:17:14.839
So it even seems that in a
student lawyer thinking about both how can they
176
00:17:15.880 --> 00:17:18.880
either poke holes in a defendant's case, right or a plaintiff's case, to
177
00:17:18.920 --> 00:17:23.759
your point, can try to go
through a forensic psychiatrist and try to ask
178
00:17:23.839 --> 00:17:27.039
questions that are sort of outside that
they're in the independent expert category. That's
179
00:17:27.039 --> 00:17:30.720
not what you're there to even do
in terms of just presenting, you know,
180
00:17:30.759 --> 00:17:33.200
evidence that that's interesting and it does
kind of show also you can see
181
00:17:33.200 --> 00:17:36.680
where it's like the especially if you
get called, you know, you get
182
00:17:36.720 --> 00:17:41.559
proposed to go act as a as
a percipient witness, but on an independent
183
00:17:41.559 --> 00:17:45.599
expert. That can be that challenge
there of not wanting to say too much,
184
00:17:45.000 --> 00:17:48.839
right, but then kind of say, well, I'm an expert in
185
00:17:48.839 --> 00:17:51.279
this field. But you know that's
not really what you're being You're being asked
186
00:17:51.279 --> 00:17:53.200
in that regard that that's a really
interesting thing. I mean, you know
187
00:17:53.319 --> 00:17:56.319
this is I'll sound like a super
amateur here because I've served on jury duty
188
00:17:56.319 --> 00:17:59.519
a number of times and that's you
know, my experience in the courtroom.
189
00:17:59.519 --> 00:18:03.279
But you always interested in this notion
too of uh, the you know,
190
00:18:03.480 --> 00:18:06.559
the kind of process, you know
it is it's it's set up in a
191
00:18:06.640 --> 00:18:10.039
very specific way, right when you
know, you can have your different opposing
192
00:18:10.079 --> 00:18:11.000
sides, you know, make their
arguments that you can. Then you'll see
193
00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:14.200
them, you know, talk to
to the witnesses and ask different questions,
194
00:18:14.240 --> 00:18:17.519
and that interesting process of like when
they have to bring in an expert or
195
00:18:17.799 --> 00:18:22.200
you know, in a forensic psychiatrist
to to kind of pay attention to what
196
00:18:22.319 --> 00:18:26.000
kind of language is used, right
in Like it's it's not almost as this
197
00:18:26.160 --> 00:18:29.599
pure kind of On the one hand, I guess it's like, you know,
198
00:18:29.599 --> 00:18:33.839
as a friendly psychiatrist, you're there
to provide expert testimony in the sense
199
00:18:33.839 --> 00:18:37.440
of saying, here's the facts that
we see, like determining kind of objective
200
00:18:37.480 --> 00:18:41.400
truth. Yet a lawyer might ask
you questions that pull you into subjectivity yourself,
201
00:18:41.440 --> 00:18:44.119
right, so you're gonna have to
have to walk that fine line,
202
00:18:44.119 --> 00:18:47.079
as it were, to make sure
that you don't accidentally do that. What
203
00:18:47.240 --> 00:18:52.319
I find so interesting about this field, this sub specialty field, is how
204
00:18:52.480 --> 00:19:00.960
nuanced it is. It's nuanced in
what do you know and what is your
205
00:19:02.000 --> 00:19:10.119
subjective opinion? And most importantly,
what are your biases? Because we all
206
00:19:10.119 --> 00:19:15.440
have biases and the more you can
be aware of them, the better you
207
00:19:15.519 --> 00:19:25.720
are at limiting your opinion to things
that you objectively can support and not just
208
00:19:25.880 --> 00:19:30.319
drifting into areas of bias. And
attorneys are very good at trying to find
209
00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:38.079
your bias. For example, it's
a deposition one oh one question every law
210
00:19:38.160 --> 00:19:44.319
student must learn in some you know, in some course that has to do
211
00:19:44.400 --> 00:19:49.160
with the practice of law. Doctor, what percentage of your cases have been
212
00:19:49.240 --> 00:19:57.680
defense and what percentage have been plaintiff? And that's an effort to presumably show
213
00:19:57.759 --> 00:20:06.680
your bias eight percent or plaintiff cases. You know, what is what I
214
00:20:06.759 --> 00:20:11.599
sometimes say, But you have to
be careful not to be a smart alec
215
00:20:11.680 --> 00:20:15.200
in a deposition. Is it is? What it is? In my case,
216
00:20:15.240 --> 00:20:22.440
it's usually two thirds to seventy percent
defense in civil matters and the rest
217
00:20:22.559 --> 00:20:27.720
is plaintiff. But that's how the
phone rings, and I don't control who
218
00:20:27.799 --> 00:20:34.480
calls me. If you're asking about
bias, then the question really is,
219
00:20:36.079 --> 00:20:41.279
doctor, how often do you come
to an opinion that you know it doesn't
220
00:20:41.359 --> 00:20:48.200
support the inquiring attorney's theory of the
case. That's the integrity question, you
221
00:20:48.240 --> 00:20:52.680
know, and that's you know,
for me, around ten percent, But
222
00:20:52.119 --> 00:20:56.759
that's the question that they're never taught
to ask, and that's really you know,
223
00:20:56.880 --> 00:21:00.960
the meaningful question about bias. Mm
hmm. That's interesting too, just
224
00:21:00.960 --> 00:21:04.279
to to give us that question,
right, because we often see in in
225
00:21:04.400 --> 00:21:07.680
a broader business context too. Right, there is this there's been engaging in
226
00:21:07.960 --> 00:21:11.400
ongoing conversations of understanding things like unconscious
bias, right in terms of what are
227
00:21:11.400 --> 00:21:15.079
you bringing to the table, whether
it could be you know, tells in
228
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:17.519
a in a you know, poker
context of like, you know, my
229
00:21:17.680 --> 00:21:19.960
my left eyes twitching when i'm you
know, when I get a when I
230
00:21:19.960 --> 00:21:23.000
get a you know, ace of
spades or something. But then also this
231
00:21:23.039 --> 00:21:27.200
idea of like how I discuss topics, right, and so I understand this
232
00:21:27.200 --> 00:21:30.519
this idea in terms of if I'm
being asked a question, it's it's kind
233
00:21:30.559 --> 00:21:33.160
of like the philosopher Kwame Apia has
said that it's, you know, a
234
00:21:33.160 --> 00:21:37.400
lot of life is not figuring out
necessarily had to play the game, but
235
00:21:37.480 --> 00:21:38.519
understand what game you're playing in the
first place, you know, And so
236
00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:44.799
this kind of question exactly. Yeah, yeah, And that's I mean,
237
00:21:44.799 --> 00:21:48.119
that's really interesting in this in this
context too, because also obviously, like
238
00:21:48.160 --> 00:21:51.559
the I want to get into some
of the subjects matter areas that we'll we'll
239
00:21:51.599 --> 00:21:53.519
kind of see in a case in
some of the cases that you've worked on
240
00:21:53.920 --> 00:21:56.839
as part of that, because it
seems like there obviously because if you're working
241
00:21:56.880 --> 00:22:00.880
in in cases around you know,
sexual abuse or domestic violence, uh,
242
00:22:02.079 --> 00:22:03.319
you know, and areas are around
dementia, right, there can be some
243
00:22:03.400 --> 00:22:07.359
challenge like there's they're emotionally charged spaces, right, there's there's there's people that
244
00:22:07.400 --> 00:22:11.240
have been wrong, you know,
the people have been hurt and so uh,
245
00:22:11.279 --> 00:22:15.039
even that, I think it's an
interesting kind of pasway to think about
246
00:22:15.039 --> 00:22:18.200
how you how you can go go
into these spaces and like sit with the
247
00:22:18.279 --> 00:22:21.279
you know, the ethics, the
methods and the and the mission of the
248
00:22:21.319 --> 00:22:23.319
work in order to not get pulled. And if if if a lawyer is
249
00:22:23.400 --> 00:22:26.359
kind of trying to pull you into
an emotional argument or something that takes you
250
00:22:26.400 --> 00:22:30.799
outside of that that space, does
that happen? You know, I don't
251
00:22:30.799 --> 00:22:33.480
know frequently, but just like what's
the percentage of times that you know,
252
00:22:33.640 --> 00:22:37.160
if you might get pulled or that
that's kind of like you you'll see,
253
00:22:37.559 --> 00:22:41.599
I guess is that a thing is
do do you find that attorneys respect the
254
00:22:41.640 --> 00:22:44.240
space or do they do you do
you find that you often will get asked
255
00:22:44.319 --> 00:22:48.240
questions that sort of try to pull
folks into an emotional argument away from a
256
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:52.839
more of like a I can support
with evidence kind of answer. It was
257
00:22:52.880 --> 00:22:59.039
such a very good question, and
like the variation among people, it has
258
00:22:59.160 --> 00:23:03.039
a lot to do with the different
with the variation among lawyers, I mean
259
00:23:03.079 --> 00:23:08.960
the cross examining attorney and we the
prob The our litigation system is an adversarial
260
00:23:10.039 --> 00:23:17.480
one, you know, It's it's
each side pulling for what they want and
261
00:23:17.519 --> 00:23:25.119
then the trier of fact trying to
decide who has authentic, capable, genuine
262
00:23:25.160 --> 00:23:29.400
facts on their side and who doesn't, and therefore who wins the argument.
263
00:23:30.440 --> 00:23:34.279
That's different from just if I can
divert direct grass for a minute. It's
264
00:23:34.319 --> 00:23:44.119
different from the European that it's called
the Napoleonic system, where the judge is
265
00:23:44.200 --> 00:23:51.680
the person who weighs the balance,
and the expert, the forensic psychiatrist in
266
00:23:51.720 --> 00:23:56.000
a French court is employed by the
court. Yeah, so in a sense
267
00:23:56.039 --> 00:24:02.680
it's a much fairer and more balanced
since except there are other problems with that
268
00:24:02.720 --> 00:24:07.079
when you have people from a particular
class and walk of life and biases,
269
00:24:07.119 --> 00:24:11.720
et cetera, being the sole arbiters
rather than our concept of a jury of
270
00:24:11.720 --> 00:24:18.359
one's peers. But you know,
it's a very difference. Isn't much less
271
00:24:18.640 --> 00:24:26.039
adversarial. So in our adversarial it
doesn't to answer your question. Even gentlemanly
272
00:24:27.119 --> 00:24:34.599
attorneys need to try and find the
holes in your argument, even if you're
273
00:24:34.640 --> 00:24:41.599
honestly saying, well, I'm not
sure about that. So in other words,
274
00:24:41.720 --> 00:24:45.880
it could be the attorney will say. In other words, it could
275
00:24:45.960 --> 00:24:48.079
be the opposite as much as it
could be what you're saying it is.
276
00:24:48.079 --> 00:24:56.839
Isn't that correct? Doctor? That's
an easy style of cross examining. But
277
00:24:56.920 --> 00:25:03.599
there are also attorneys who are works, in my opinion, and who want
278
00:25:03.720 --> 00:25:11.839
to play Perry Mason with gotcha,
and which is sometimes dramatic and theatrical and
279
00:25:11.920 --> 00:25:15.599
effective with a jury. Sometimes it's
off putting to a jury if they like
280
00:25:15.680 --> 00:25:22.599
the expert and the attorney who's crossed
examining the expert is trying to crucify them.
281
00:25:22.000 --> 00:25:29.440
That doesn't necessarily win points for the
crucifier. So it depends, you
282
00:25:29.480 --> 00:25:34.279
know, if the expert is pompous
and aloof and you know, talks like
283
00:25:34.359 --> 00:25:40.839
an academic and jargon, and there's
a feeling of the jury that they're being
284
00:25:40.880 --> 00:25:47.480
condescended to. Then the gotcha cross
examiner, you know, may be very
285
00:25:47.519 --> 00:25:55.599
effective in in poking holes in the
credibility of the expert, but in general,
286
00:25:56.880 --> 00:26:00.880
one of them when you what one
learns to do when you're trained in
287
00:26:00.960 --> 00:26:07.599
this, which most doctors are not
and therefore feel great anxiety about being cross
288
00:26:07.680 --> 00:26:15.480
examined is listen to the question and
take as much time as you need before
289
00:26:15.680 --> 00:26:22.640
answering, and control the pace because
across examining, attorney may try to fire
290
00:26:22.680 --> 00:26:26.039
stuff at you like this, you
know, and get you off balance,
291
00:26:26.799 --> 00:26:32.680
and you just take it down a
notch and say, well, let me
292
00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:38.880
think about that, counselor, and
that gives you time to think about just
293
00:26:38.920 --> 00:26:48.200
what you're saying, but also to
listen because the attorney who has retained you
294
00:26:48.960 --> 00:26:52.920
may stand up and say objection your
honor. This goes to blah blah blah,
295
00:26:53.000 --> 00:26:59.279
and that is a signal to what
you should be considering or not saying
296
00:26:59.759 --> 00:27:06.279
in respond. So there's a lot
of theatrics to this, you know.
297
00:27:06.359 --> 00:27:12.400
It's not unfortunately or just understandably because
it's a human activity, and it's adversterial.
298
00:27:12.440 --> 00:27:18.200
It's not all about justice. A
great deal of it is about procedure.
299
00:27:18.480 --> 00:27:22.559
A whole watch of litigation is about
procedure. You could have a great
300
00:27:22.599 --> 00:27:26.279
case, but you file it too
late and it is out of time and
301
00:27:26.319 --> 00:27:33.720
so procedurally you don't have a chance
it'll be dismissed. But even in when
302
00:27:33.720 --> 00:27:40.799
you're in litigation, the procedures that
go on in the courtroom are important to
303
00:27:40.880 --> 00:27:45.759
understand if you're a witness, so
that you can so it can to the
304
00:27:45.799 --> 00:27:52.839
extent appropriate guide how you respond.
And also if just want to think,
305
00:27:53.119 --> 00:27:57.359
but you know, if the attorney
who has retained you stands up and objects
306
00:27:57.359 --> 00:28:02.319
to the question you've just been asked, and the court sustained the objection,
307
00:28:02.480 --> 00:28:06.279
you don't have to answer. It
gets you off the book easier that way,
308
00:28:06.359 --> 00:28:10.160
right, Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's it's interesting to think about
309
00:28:10.160 --> 00:28:11.960
that too, where because it's oftentimes
and for the most part, right,
310
00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:15.119
it's one person talking at a time, right, it could be the cross
311
00:28:15.119 --> 00:28:18.559
examining attorney, right, But then
often say objection and it'll it'll stop it,
312
00:28:18.640 --> 00:28:21.039
you know. Or that's the interesting
point too, when you see when
313
00:28:21.079 --> 00:28:22.920
it becomes a team sport. Then
it also tells you, all right,
314
00:28:23.119 --> 00:28:25.839
I either have to continue or I
have to stop now, you know,
315
00:28:26.279 --> 00:28:29.079
right, which is what could be
helpful. I think that, right,
316
00:28:30.839 --> 00:28:33.519
I think this is this is super
fascinating, and I think that you know,
317
00:28:33.559 --> 00:28:36.680
part of it I'm curious about,
like maybe we can we dive into
318
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:38.519
because something you set up top two
that that I want to spend some time
319
00:28:38.519 --> 00:28:41.799
with, is this idea that right
human behavior is is can be difficult to
320
00:28:44.039 --> 00:28:45.000
you know, map out objectively,
right, I mean, obviously we all
321
00:28:45.000 --> 00:28:48.240
have subjective experiences, right, and
you set a good example of of the
322
00:28:48.400 --> 00:28:52.279
if I either having a bad day
or I think my television is talking to
323
00:28:52.319 --> 00:28:56.119
me, there's there's also an objective
kind of standard that we've all agreed upon
324
00:28:56.160 --> 00:28:59.160
that televisions typically don't talk to you. I mean besides when they're on,
325
00:28:59.319 --> 00:29:02.240
but you know the tea it selfie
doesn't talk to you, right, And
326
00:29:02.279 --> 00:29:03.960
so that can that can kind of
say, okay, well, there may
327
00:29:03.960 --> 00:29:07.039
be something objective that we can talk
about even though your subjective experiences is x
328
00:29:07.119 --> 00:29:08.599
y Z. So let's talk about
like that, like the kind of complexities
329
00:29:08.640 --> 00:29:12.039
of how do we evaluate mental health
in legal context? When when we're looking
330
00:29:12.039 --> 00:29:17.079
at scenarios like this, or maybe
you can pick if there's a case that
331
00:29:17.079 --> 00:29:18.799
has jumped out to you. I
mean you mentioned before that I think it
332
00:29:18.880 --> 00:29:22.279
is really interesting to the insanity is
a legal term, not a medical term,
333
00:29:22.680 --> 00:29:25.839
and that's something that we know who's
using that wear can have some important
334
00:29:25.839 --> 00:29:27.960
implications, right, But yeah,
walk me through that a little bit like
335
00:29:29.119 --> 00:29:33.599
these complexities. Well, a case
that I was involved in quite a few
336
00:29:33.640 --> 00:29:41.039
years ago, which was a civil
case, that is, people were suiting
337
00:29:41.480 --> 00:29:49.839
other people or damages which results only
in money being paid to if they win
338
00:29:51.160 --> 00:29:55.960
or not paid if they lose by
the defendant. Did it plane to it?
339
00:29:56.400 --> 00:30:02.839
It touched on a murder and a
criminal matter, and it was a
340
00:30:02.880 --> 00:30:12.559
man who was diagnosed in his teens. When in his late teens when psychotic
341
00:30:12.640 --> 00:30:22.039
disorders like schizophrenia usually present themselves.
That is, people start becoming symptomatic with
342
00:30:22.119 --> 00:30:27.319
illusions and illucinations if they have schizophrenia, which is probably a group of diseases,
343
00:30:27.400 --> 00:30:33.240
but it is a labeled mental illness
in their late teens or very early
344
00:30:33.319 --> 00:30:38.920
twenties. You don't develop schizophrenia,
you know, at forty nine too much?
345
00:30:38.960 --> 00:30:42.359
Would it had to have happened before
to stignal that you may have the
346
00:30:42.480 --> 00:30:52.200
psychosis which is deviating from consensual reality, having problems with the term of art.
347
00:30:52.279 --> 00:30:56.799
In psychiatry or psychology, it's called
reality testing. But it's of a
348
00:30:56.799 --> 00:31:00.160
different It could be from drugs,
it could be from brain disease, it
349
00:31:00.279 --> 00:31:07.880
could be from some other mental illness. So this was a man who became
350
00:31:07.640 --> 00:31:14.559
was diagnosed with schizophrenia after he was
violent at home. He was punching hole
351
00:31:15.000 --> 00:31:21.160
he was his parents were Asian immigrants
and said they were kind of old world
352
00:31:21.279 --> 00:31:26.160
from Asia, and he would punch
holes in the wall and then he assaulted
353
00:31:26.160 --> 00:31:32.079
his father on a couple occasions.
I don't even know what the disputes were,
354
00:31:33.000 --> 00:31:36.079
but the police were involved and as
a result of that, he was
355
00:31:36.119 --> 00:31:41.640
diagnosed and treated for schizophrenia, and
he did very well when he took his
356
00:31:41.759 --> 00:31:52.279
medications, and then he was in
a different state where he As many people
357
00:31:52.319 --> 00:32:00.000
who have severe mental illness like schizophrenia, he was economically marginal as an adult.
358
00:32:00.200 --> 00:32:06.799
He couldn't hold he couldn't really have
a career or hold high paid jobs.
359
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:13.200
So he worked intermittently and he was
on you know, benefits, public
360
00:32:13.200 --> 00:32:22.880
benefits. Intimately and this date we
had outsourt to a corporation the treatment of
361
00:32:22.160 --> 00:32:34.519
the indigence severe mentally ill. The
highest training level expert in the treader in
362
00:32:34.559 --> 00:32:40.119
the system that this company had in
this state was a nurse practitioner psychiatric nurse
363
00:32:40.200 --> 00:32:51.880
practitioners. And he stopped appearing for
his regular monthly of check in appointment,
364
00:32:52.079 --> 00:32:54.079
I think when his meds would be
renewed, et cetera. He lived on
365
00:32:54.119 --> 00:32:59.880
his own the time, he was
probably in his early forties, was a
366
00:33:00.079 --> 00:33:07.640
solitary guy. And she was alarmed
about this, and they had like a
367
00:33:07.680 --> 00:33:13.200
home visiting team. So they sent
out the home visiting team and they knocked
368
00:33:13.200 --> 00:33:15.519
on the door and they heard dog
barking. All the blinds were closed,
369
00:33:16.000 --> 00:33:22.400
and they did nothing. He didn't
answer. They did nothing. They did
370
00:33:22.400 --> 00:33:28.880
this a couple of times, and
then he sort of drifted from really any
371
00:33:29.039 --> 00:33:35.480
active coverage. Over six months,
he became he had stopped taking his meds,
372
00:33:35.519 --> 00:33:39.319
and he had stopped getting them refilled, and became increasingly psychotic. He
373
00:33:39.480 --> 00:33:47.359
did believe that the TV was sending
him messages. He believed that license plates
374
00:33:47.359 --> 00:33:55.079
were coded messages to him from the
Chinese embassy. And one day and he
375
00:33:55.799 --> 00:34:02.440
had another social problem in our society. He had a gun and one day,
376
00:34:02.480 --> 00:34:07.760
at one in the afternoon he went
to a Walmart parking lot and shot
377
00:34:08.199 --> 00:34:15.079
repeatedly two strangers dead in the parking
lot. I was an expert for the
378
00:34:15.119 --> 00:34:25.760
plaintiff, which was the widow of
one of the murdered victims and her three
379
00:34:25.840 --> 00:34:38.079
young children. And the issue in
this case that was interesting was the failure
380
00:34:38.400 --> 00:34:50.079
of the outside corporation that hired the
people who were supposedly providing care for the
381
00:34:50.119 --> 00:34:54.960
indigen severely mentally ill failure to follow
up on this because in that state,
382
00:34:57.159 --> 00:35:01.840
it was very easy to compel the
police to pick up the person. Even
383
00:35:01.840 --> 00:35:06.920
a neighbor could say, I'm very
worried about this person. You can call
384
00:35:06.920 --> 00:35:09.480
the police. Would you please do
a wellness check and if you can't,
385
00:35:10.639 --> 00:35:16.280
you know, get evidence that things
are fine. Bring him to a mental
386
00:35:16.280 --> 00:35:24.199
health like an emergency room, a
crisis center where trained professionals can evaluate and
387
00:35:24.320 --> 00:35:30.480
take appropriate action, meaning provide care
if he needs it, you know,
388
00:35:30.519 --> 00:35:35.519
if he were if someone had,
if the police had come not he not
389
00:35:35.639 --> 00:35:38.800
responded and they broke down the door
and found that he was delusional, etcetera.
390
00:35:38.880 --> 00:35:42.760
They'd bring him to such an ability, he would have been hospitalized and
391
00:35:42.840 --> 00:35:49.360
medicated and treated. They hadn't done
that. So the defense in this case
392
00:35:49.480 --> 00:35:54.039
position was the lack of foreseeability.
How could we know this guy was going
393
00:35:54.079 --> 00:36:00.679
to go kill people? And the
plaintiff's case was that's not the issue,
394
00:36:01.239 --> 00:36:07.800
the excellence on the wrong styll abl
The issue is you didn't take appropriate action
395
00:36:07.719 --> 00:36:13.119
to get this person evaluated. You
knocked on the door, there was no
396
00:36:13.239 --> 00:36:16.679
answer, and you left. Basically, Hey, an interesting analogy would be
397
00:36:19.440 --> 00:36:30.840
if he were a woman with a
suspicious papsmere. Most hospitals or insurance systems
398
00:36:30.920 --> 00:36:37.280
like in the West Coast Kaiser have
elaborate checklist procedures to go through. You
399
00:36:37.320 --> 00:36:44.599
know, now that's not a potentially
violent situation, but not just to call
400
00:36:44.960 --> 00:36:50.039
to send letters and certified letters.
They'll send out a nurse practice, They'll
401
00:36:50.039 --> 00:36:55.480
go to great lengths to follow up
and get that person back in for the
402
00:36:55.519 --> 00:37:00.559
follow up evaluation of their suspicious papsmere. But in this case, and I've
403
00:37:00.559 --> 00:37:05.199
been involved in other cases, it's
kind of like too much effort, and
404
00:37:05.320 --> 00:37:09.360
so they dropped the ball. And
the consequence it's not that it wasn't foreseeable
405
00:37:09.400 --> 00:37:16.159
that this man would kill people rather
than uh, you know, running in
406
00:37:16.199 --> 00:37:22.480
the street naked or something that was
not violent, but it or the issue
407
00:37:22.519 --> 00:37:28.440
was that they hadn't provided the appropriate
follow up. So I've kind of lott
408
00:37:28.519 --> 00:37:32.679
my my plot here and talking to
you. But I think that that was
409
00:37:34.639 --> 00:37:40.239
in response to, you know,
a real case where which no, well
410
00:37:40.280 --> 00:37:44.800
it was yeah, and and the
kind of question there was also thinking about
411
00:37:44.880 --> 00:37:46.480
this idea of the I mean,
you illustrated it perfectly. It's just the
412
00:37:46.480 --> 00:37:52.119
complexities of when we're evaluating mental health
and a legal context, like what does
413
00:37:52.159 --> 00:37:53.119
it mean? You know, and
you brought it. I think you brought
414
00:37:53.159 --> 00:37:58.199
a number of really really relevant examples
and in points there were just in terms
415
00:37:58.239 --> 00:38:04.360
of when we're we have a case
around somebody that has a mental illness and
416
00:38:04.400 --> 00:38:10.039
then especially with something like schizophrenia,
and then there's a challenge around their lifestyle.
417
00:38:10.239 --> 00:38:14.679
You know, you canotically marginal marginalized
like they're not quote unquote used to
418
00:38:15.320 --> 00:38:17.800
you know, living a quote normal
life, or like the norms and standards
419
00:38:17.840 --> 00:38:23.360
of maybe answering your door when you
when you someone knocks right or obviously having
420
00:38:23.400 --> 00:38:29.000
delusions or things where we are hallucinating
that a license plate is sending us signals
421
00:38:29.800 --> 00:38:32.360
uh, and then how that translates
to the kinds of actions or in this
422
00:38:32.400 --> 00:38:36.360
case, like the kinds of help
they do or do not get in a
423
00:38:36.400 --> 00:38:40.400
social work medical context. And then
how that might translate over into into a
424
00:38:40.440 --> 00:38:43.719
legal case. To me, I
mean, I've seen like there's like three
425
00:38:43.719 --> 00:38:45.360
steps there that are quite challenging to
kind of work with. Right, so
426
00:38:45.440 --> 00:38:51.519
you can both determine did a murder
take place? Yes, and then what
427
00:38:51.920 --> 00:38:53.480
happened as part of that right?
And then the synderty argument where you said
428
00:38:53.440 --> 00:38:57.159
that the defense was saying that there's
a lack of foreseeable action we did we
429
00:38:57.159 --> 00:38:59.239
couldn't. How could we know he's
going to do that? Right? And
430
00:38:59.280 --> 00:39:01.519
then this argument I think interesting there
was like, well, no, that's
431
00:39:01.559 --> 00:39:05.559
not the point. The point was
actually that there was not treatment, adequate
432
00:39:05.559 --> 00:39:10.840
treatment in place. An interesting sidebar
on this was obviously there was a criminal
433
00:39:10.880 --> 00:39:15.000
case. I was in the civil
case. A criminal case usually takes precedent
434
00:39:15.079 --> 00:39:21.159
because it involved the deprivation of liberty. It's a higher priority than money settlement
435
00:39:21.280 --> 00:39:27.320
for damages. And he was found
incompetent to stand trial, and he would
436
00:39:27.320 --> 00:39:36.360
send to what's called a competency restoration
program at a state hospital and they could
437
00:39:36.360 --> 00:39:40.199
not. There were several attempts and
they could not restore competency. And at
438
00:39:40.199 --> 00:39:45.920
the end of this process, he
was by default found not guilty by reason
439
00:39:45.960 --> 00:39:51.639
of insanity because his competency that sand
trial could not be restored, which meant
440
00:39:51.679 --> 00:39:54.920
that that doesn't mean he walks free, meant that he was basically he received
441
00:39:54.920 --> 00:40:01.400
an indefinite sentence that wasn't called that
to a state mental health hospital until such
442
00:40:01.559 --> 00:40:07.679
time as he was deemed no longer
a danger to society. And I don't
443
00:40:07.719 --> 00:40:12.880
know what happened after that. I
mean, medicine has evolved. There are
444
00:40:12.920 --> 00:40:20.039
now good what are called depot medications. You can get antipsychotic injections. What's
445
00:40:20.079 --> 00:40:24.199
a month. It's like slow release, and so people like this can be
446
00:40:24.360 --> 00:40:30.679
managed in terms of keeping them on
their medication because I mean, if they
447
00:40:30.679 --> 00:40:34.639
didn't show up for their monthly shot, you'd have the same situation deja bou
448
00:40:34.679 --> 00:40:37.199
all over again. But you know, and you'd need a system that was
449
00:40:37.280 --> 00:40:42.400
going to follow up and make sure. But it's conceivable that he could be
450
00:40:42.559 --> 00:40:52.800
released from this indefinite sentence as not
a danger to society if the civil authorities
451
00:40:53.079 --> 00:40:59.920
made sure that he got these monthly
shot but I don't know that that was
452
00:41:00.079 --> 00:41:04.639
the outcome. The last I heard
he was in a state hospital. But
453
00:41:04.800 --> 00:41:09.000
that's interesting too, So even this
idea of how medical practice evolves and changes
454
00:41:09.039 --> 00:41:13.079
over time, you know, and
I'm also thinking as anthropologist, you know,
455
00:41:13.480 --> 00:41:15.760
you know, do we see cultural
attitudes towards like mental health changing also,
456
00:41:15.800 --> 00:41:22.000
and does that affect you know,
how how like a deposition might happen
457
00:41:22.079 --> 00:41:23.639
or something. So I'm curious if
you have examples or you've seen that kind
458
00:41:23.639 --> 00:41:28.239
of in play too, either medicine
changing or kind of cultural attitudes about mental
459
00:41:28.239 --> 00:41:31.480
health, and like how that affected
a trial. The cultural attitudes have certainly
460
00:41:31.599 --> 00:41:38.480
changed. There's lots of examples.
In my in my fifty year career,
461
00:41:42.000 --> 00:41:47.559
homosexuality has moved from being listed as
a mental disorder in the Diagnostic Statistical Manual
462
00:41:49.119 --> 00:41:55.719
to gay marriage. So that's a
huge social transition. It's which I find
463
00:41:55.760 --> 00:42:00.360
is so interesting in that regard as
a digression, is in the same period
464
00:42:00.480 --> 00:42:09.000
that that thank Goodness has evolved,
that are social thinking about choice of people
465
00:42:09.039 --> 00:42:16.119
to love has evolved, rov Wade
has gone backwards. Yeah, So you
466
00:42:16.159 --> 00:42:22.079
know, it's it's weird when you
get to these social issues and which often
467
00:42:22.119 --> 00:42:30.000
have large religious components, and how
one, you know, at least in
468
00:42:30.519 --> 00:42:38.079
here evolves and the other regresses.
It doesn't even stay static. But so
469
00:42:39.039 --> 00:42:46.440
when I was I graduated from medical
school a long time ago in nineteen seventy
470
00:42:46.480 --> 00:42:52.400
one, and I moved from the
East Coast from New York to California and
471
00:42:52.400 --> 00:42:57.079
did my internship, and that ultimately
did my residency there, although I was
472
00:42:57.280 --> 00:43:04.119
supposed to do it in Boston,
and the that was a time when Ronald
473
00:43:04.199 --> 00:43:10.039
Reagan was governor of California and what
was the norm nationally of state mental hospitals
474
00:43:10.360 --> 00:43:17.119
were being emptied out. It coincided
with two factors. One was the advent
475
00:43:17.280 --> 00:43:29.280
of thorazine, the first antipsychotic drugs, which, like all technological changes,
476
00:43:29.400 --> 00:43:32.840
improvements, you know, brought with
it many fantasies that it would you know,
477
00:43:34.039 --> 00:43:40.199
liberate mentally ill people, et cetera. And it also coincided with a
478
00:43:40.280 --> 00:43:50.840
conservative effort to cut state spending.
And what the unintended consequence was beginning in
479
00:43:50.880 --> 00:43:59.519
California was homelessness because the efforts to
make community mental health facilities, both residential
480
00:43:59.559 --> 00:44:08.039
and tree where these warehoused mentally severely
mentally ill people would would be would move
481
00:44:08.119 --> 00:44:14.199
to from the state hospital and the
institutions was never was an unfulfilled promise.
482
00:44:14.239 --> 00:44:22.400
It was underfunded and understaffed and never
really worked. And coincidentally, severely mentally
483
00:44:22.440 --> 00:44:29.920
ill people often duly diagnosed with drug
addiction as well as severe mental illness ended
484
00:44:30.000 --> 00:44:35.320
up becoming the homeless population. And
they started in California like many things back
485
00:44:35.360 --> 00:44:43.519
then, and then became national.
So so that's that all was the beginning
486
00:44:43.840 --> 00:44:53.480
of reintegrating the warehouse mentally ill into
the community been a very bumpy road.
487
00:44:54.039 --> 00:45:01.760
But but that you know that I
think that has the homelessness is a severe,
488
00:45:01.880 --> 00:45:07.039
ongoing, unintended consequence problem. But
I think that this general social attitude
489
00:45:07.079 --> 00:45:15.559
about mental illness has become more accepting
and everyone either knows or may have a
490
00:45:15.599 --> 00:45:22.840
family member who has bipolar disorder or
some severe mental illness. And so that's
491
00:45:22.880 --> 00:45:28.719
been a big social change. And
you know, going back to the pre
492
00:45:29.000 --> 00:45:34.159
say seventies, when people will warehouse. To go back even further, Abraham
493
00:45:34.199 --> 00:45:38.719
Lincoln had his wife institutionalized. She
had depression, as did he and I
494
00:45:38.719 --> 00:45:42.920
think after the death of a child, maybe had a postpart of depression.
495
00:45:44.280 --> 00:45:46.679
In those days, women had no
rights, and he was a you know,
496
00:45:47.639 --> 00:45:53.960
Abraham Lincoln, viewed as a very
good man in our history, had
497
00:45:54.000 --> 00:45:58.840
his wife institutionalized for I don't know
how long, but for a long it
498
00:45:58.880 --> 00:46:01.360
wasn't like a two week in the
right. But we definitely call that like
499
00:46:01.440 --> 00:46:06.000
not not good now, right,
like not exactly not a positive trait.
500
00:46:08.079 --> 00:46:10.800
But I think that's that's a challenge, that's it's an interesting challenge point too,
501
00:46:10.800 --> 00:46:15.039
because even this, like those are
both great examples where we have the
502
00:46:15.360 --> 00:46:20.639
a kind of unintended social consequence,
right that comes from both a political move
503
00:46:20.679 --> 00:46:22.840
of defunding or cutting out you know, state spending. But then on top
504
00:46:22.840 --> 00:46:27.360
of that too, like we see
a medicine introduced into the into into the
505
00:46:27.360 --> 00:46:30.920
society, and then it's you know, there's kind of this desire to we
506
00:46:30.920 --> 00:46:32.159
can change I mean this, I
mean it's got me thinking too in terms
507
00:46:32.199 --> 00:46:37.639
of both you know, pharmaceutical culture
today and the rise of what we're seeing
508
00:46:37.719 --> 00:46:39.440
now. We're seeing you know,
some back and forth about things like for
509
00:46:39.480 --> 00:46:43.719
Alzheimer's drugs, you know, and
and weight loss drugs has been some back
510
00:46:43.719 --> 00:46:46.239
and forth, right but obviously there's
a massive fentanyl crisis too, from an
511
00:46:46.239 --> 00:46:51.840
opiate and you know, opioids into
into an epidemic of people getting coked on
512
00:46:51.880 --> 00:46:53.559
them, and so you know,
it's interesting to kind of think about it.
513
00:46:53.559 --> 00:46:57.360
I don't know if your work delves
into these these realms, but just
514
00:46:57.400 --> 00:47:00.920
like sometimes the role I think this
is not an anti antifarmer question, but
515
00:47:00.039 --> 00:47:04.679
just like just interesting in this idea
of like do we see medicine come into
516
00:47:04.719 --> 00:47:07.320
play? Because it has it come
to play more frequently? I wonder too,
517
00:47:07.320 --> 00:47:12.039
you know over the past fifty years
in terms of the where we see
518
00:47:12.039 --> 00:47:15.960
people talking about or is it not
not basically like seens as like something that
519
00:47:15.960 --> 00:47:17.679
we're looking to blame or the cause
of some problem, but just like as
520
00:47:17.679 --> 00:47:21.679
a part of that conversation, whether
it's like somebody's on some certain kind of
521
00:47:21.719 --> 00:47:24.360
med or they didn't take their meds
to to the other point, as part
522
00:47:24.360 --> 00:47:28.159
of that game. I think it's
an interesting thing because it's like in medical
523
00:47:28.159 --> 00:47:30.800
anthropology, you know, we we
we see conversations in terms of the increasing
524
00:47:30.880 --> 00:47:34.920
kind of medicalization in air quotes of
society, right that we can kind of
525
00:47:34.920 --> 00:47:39.480
medicalize an aspect of somebody's life and
actually homosexuality being in the DSM three or
526
00:47:39.480 --> 00:47:42.679
four at the time, and like
now not like there's an interesting that's a
527
00:47:42.679 --> 00:47:46.599
good point of like a a you
know, a social attitude and perception changing
528
00:47:46.679 --> 00:47:52.400
around around a social practice you know
that was then also incorrectly put into a
529
00:47:52.440 --> 00:47:54.599
mental category you know at the time. And so I'm just curious, like,
530
00:47:54.599 --> 00:47:57.920
do we see are the things like
this that guy stand out to you
531
00:47:58.039 --> 00:48:05.920
that we see you know, medicine
or the medicalization and things like this that
532
00:48:05.920 --> 00:48:08.320
that are that make for cases that
that seem interesting, Like they may not
533
00:48:08.400 --> 00:48:12.360
be we don't preat them to be
the kind of case. I guess in
534
00:48:12.400 --> 00:48:15.400
the future whe they're kind of changing
what cases are about. I guess it's
535
00:48:15.440 --> 00:48:19.119
a very vague question, but I
mean it's got me thinking about this idea
536
00:48:19.119 --> 00:48:22.519
in terms of like how cases are
formed. Like when there's murder in a
537
00:48:22.599 --> 00:48:24.559
and a person that has a schizophrenia
that that's that feels clear, you know,
538
00:48:24.679 --> 00:48:28.079
not great, but it feels clear. Right, if there's domestic abuse
539
00:48:28.119 --> 00:48:31.280
that feels clear. I guess do
we see anything that makes it kind of
540
00:48:31.360 --> 00:48:35.880
murky to know should this should we
be calling in a forensic psychiatrist? Right
541
00:48:35.920 --> 00:48:37.239
that there's something somebody who's on our
author mets or something like that does,
542
00:48:37.360 --> 00:48:39.840
is there Maybe you don't see that
part of it too in they're deciding who
543
00:48:39.840 --> 00:48:44.199
they need to call for for expert
testimony. But I'm curious if you've seen
544
00:48:44.280 --> 00:48:52.320
conversations around that idea. You're covering
a really uh I think it. Yes,
545
00:48:52.480 --> 00:49:01.639
there's been a medicalization in behavioral aspects
of medicine, So the prescription of
546
00:49:05.320 --> 00:49:08.719
stimulants for children who have a d
D, or the prescription of any depressant
547
00:49:09.440 --> 00:49:19.719
for adults who have even as mild
as situational depression. Let's say bereavement after
548
00:49:19.760 --> 00:49:24.880
the death. There there some people
will get medicated for that, and that's
549
00:49:27.039 --> 00:49:31.119
you know, that's debatable. It's
not necessarily wrong, but it is not
550
00:49:31.159 --> 00:49:37.920
necessarily right either because there, for
example, there are natural processes like bereavement
551
00:49:38.039 --> 00:49:46.199
that you want a person two that
are not pathological any more than pain during
552
00:49:46.320 --> 00:49:52.239
childbirth is pathological, although you might
use you know, analgesics, a pain
553
00:49:52.360 --> 00:50:00.519
medicine to reduce that pain. But
there is complicated bereavement. There are people
554
00:50:00.599 --> 00:50:07.119
who's who lose a spouse and they
stop functioning for years, and they're totally
555
00:50:07.159 --> 00:50:12.280
focused on the death of the spouts
they can't move on. That's if a
556
00:50:12.360 --> 00:50:19.719
situation that needs treatment, it may
involve medication and or psychotherapy whatever. So
557
00:50:20.559 --> 00:50:24.039
you know, I think it's another
ball to keep one's eye on of how
558
00:50:24.119 --> 00:50:30.920
much is medication being used and is
that overuse or is that justified. The
559
00:50:31.000 --> 00:50:37.519
other side of that is that fifteen
percent of severely depressed people kill themselves.
560
00:50:37.559 --> 00:50:44.480
If I'm treated, it's a significant
mortality. It's not you know, oh,
561
00:50:44.760 --> 00:50:46.880
you know, just go to the
gym and exercise and you'll feel better,
562
00:50:47.199 --> 00:50:52.360
you know, or take a walk, and so to some extent,
563
00:50:52.480 --> 00:51:00.280
the use of antidepressants liberally reduces that. But it's also complicated because I don't
564
00:51:00.280 --> 00:51:04.519
know if you remember quite a few
years ago, it's probably in the nineties,
565
00:51:06.159 --> 00:51:13.800
there were hearings in Congress about antidepressants
leading to adolescent suicide. And there's
566
00:51:13.880 --> 00:51:19.360
now you know, your listeners made
no But it's something called the black box
567
00:51:19.440 --> 00:51:27.400
warning, which means that in the
pharmaceutical companies insert in a drug package,
568
00:51:27.920 --> 00:51:32.000
there's something that has a literally black
box around it, and antidepressants all have
569
00:51:32.119 --> 00:51:39.360
this black box may cause suicide.
That's very controversial because many of the people
570
00:51:39.360 --> 00:51:50.639
who testified in Congress who tragically had
lost children were of a deep anti psychiatry
571
00:51:50.719 --> 00:51:54.519
conviction. You know, it wasn't
a random population. It was a very
572
00:51:54.559 --> 00:52:00.719
biased group who went to the trouble
of testifying and gave a tip the scales,
573
00:52:00.320 --> 00:52:07.519
particularly with politicians. Subsequent large studies
showed that the use of antidepressants with
574
00:52:07.639 --> 00:52:15.320
adolescens led to a reduction in suicide
on large scale, but of course there
575
00:52:15.320 --> 00:52:21.360
are suicides even with people taking antidepressant. The problem, though, that wasn't
576
00:52:21.480 --> 00:52:31.920
understood sufficiently, was that if you
have a tendency to becoming agitated or bipolar.
577
00:52:32.400 --> 00:52:37.679
You know, someone can present as
depressed, but they actually have really
578
00:52:37.760 --> 00:52:45.880
the neurobiology to be bipolar. They
go between very down and very elated and
579
00:52:46.000 --> 00:52:53.400
manic, and without judgment, you
can unmask mania in a person who's really
580
00:52:53.440 --> 00:52:59.639
bipolar by bipolar by just giving them
an antidepressant. And so what needs to
581
00:52:59.679 --> 00:53:06.119
be done at the first science is
at a mood stabilizer so they can benefit
582
00:53:06.159 --> 00:53:13.239
from the antidepressant without being launched into
really crazy and it can be psychotic mania.
583
00:53:13.400 --> 00:53:19.159
So what was happening to a large
extent is a GP or more likely
584
00:53:19.199 --> 00:53:22.800
a pediatrician would see, this kid's
depressed, I'll give them any depressant.
585
00:53:22.880 --> 00:53:27.559
I'll see you in six weeks,
where the psychiatrist would have said, i'll
586
00:53:27.559 --> 00:53:30.760
see you in two days, or
we'll talk on this, you know today,
587
00:53:30.880 --> 00:53:34.840
we'll talk on a video, you
know, before the end of the
588
00:53:34.840 --> 00:53:39.039
week, and to see how they're
responding. If they're going from being inert
589
00:53:39.280 --> 00:53:46.079
and depressed to being agitated and excited, that's an important warning sign that you
590
00:53:46.159 --> 00:53:52.559
need to you maybe be masking a
bipolar disorder, which doesn't mean the antidepressdant
591
00:53:52.639 --> 00:53:54.320
is not indicated, but it means
you got to add a mood stabilizer.
592
00:53:54.800 --> 00:54:00.599
And that is a dangerous situation because
a kid who's thinking about suicide but too
593
00:54:00.679 --> 00:54:06.519
inert to act on it may then
be activated and act on it and you
594
00:54:06.559 --> 00:54:08.960
know, a tragedy, uh,
you know, to say the least so
595
00:54:10.719 --> 00:54:17.840
that you know it's complicated more complicated
species, you know, right, But
596
00:54:17.920 --> 00:54:20.920
it's it's a good point too.
I mean, even what you're saying up
597
00:54:20.960 --> 00:54:25.119
top about there's the there's also the
treating psychiatrist, right, and then there's
598
00:54:25.159 --> 00:54:29.719
then there's the phrasy psychiatrist in the
in the law space, and like this
599
00:54:29.800 --> 00:54:31.639
is a great example of why those
two can't mix, right, because if
600
00:54:31.679 --> 00:54:37.000
you're if you're prescribing meds and working
with somebody and then you're on a case
601
00:54:37.039 --> 00:54:42.280
talking about how those two meds that
didn't interact in a potential scenario, right,
602
00:54:42.280 --> 00:54:44.159
you don't want it. You can't
be the treating doctor, you know,
603
00:54:44.480 --> 00:54:50.519
and also talk about the fact and
then objectively weighing all the objective evidence.
604
00:54:50.519 --> 00:54:58.440
And that's the that's the I think
the biggest difference is a treating psychiatrist
605
00:54:58.519 --> 00:55:07.239
is dealing with subjectivity because the state
at which psychiatry is today is primitive compared
606
00:55:07.239 --> 00:55:12.159
to the rest of medicine, whereas
a forensic psychiatrist is trying to look at
607
00:55:12.239 --> 00:55:15.719
as much object to that as that
they can gather and it will give a
608
00:55:15.719 --> 00:55:23.519
different perspective. And it's interesting.
I'm talking the other day to a prominent
609
00:55:23.639 --> 00:55:32.360
neuros psychopharmacologist. He's someone who is
like the caboose on the train of referral.
610
00:55:32.800 --> 00:55:42.199
So when people don't respond to medications
and this is all psychopharm this isn't
611
00:55:42.239 --> 00:55:49.519
psychotherapy a different issue, they get
to him. It's like a tertiary referral
612
00:55:50.079 --> 00:55:55.360
call. And he was saying,
you know, he was critiquing the DSM,
613
00:55:55.519 --> 00:55:59.880
which is a diagnostic and cistical manual
that you and I have referred to.
614
00:56:00.480 --> 00:56:06.559
That's the list of diagnoses for psychiatry, but the way that psychiatry still
615
00:56:07.079 --> 00:56:13.679
diagnoses things, for example, a
major depressive disorder. He said, the
616
00:56:13.840 --> 00:56:19.199
depression is a symptom, just like
fever is a symptom. It's not a
617
00:56:19.239 --> 00:56:24.239
disorder. It's a symptom. We
don't necessarily understand the disorders. But if
618
00:56:24.239 --> 00:56:32.519
you go back to the first two
decades of the twentieth century, there were
619
00:56:32.639 --> 00:56:37.199
elaborate descriptions of different kinds of fevers. You know, there was this kind
620
00:56:37.239 --> 00:56:42.639
of a fever disorder and that kind
of a fever disorder, and it's because
621
00:56:42.639 --> 00:56:47.760
they didn't understand the underlying biology that
was giving rise to the fevers. And
622
00:56:47.800 --> 00:56:53.960
he was likening that to where psychiatry
is today. That the biomarkers and the
623
00:56:54.000 --> 00:57:00.920
neurophysiology and general physiology that results in
things that we identify as patterns of a
624
00:57:01.000 --> 00:57:06.039
disorder, it's really at a primitive
state. That's interesting, I mean,
625
00:57:06.159 --> 00:57:09.239
is that kind of an arena that
because I know you also you also mentor
626
00:57:09.239 --> 00:57:13.400
a lot of folks coming into the
into the field and is this is this
627
00:57:13.440 --> 00:57:15.679
also an area I guess, Like, I think that's a fascinating question to
628
00:57:15.760 --> 00:57:21.079
kind of think about, Like do
we see any shifts like this in psychiatric
629
00:57:21.119 --> 00:57:23.360
training that are trying to find either
I don't know, if it's more connectivity
630
00:57:23.400 --> 00:57:29.840
between you know, neurophysiology and biomarkers
and things like that, you know,
631
00:57:30.280 --> 00:57:31.320
or I guess, or maybe the
other question is like what is what is
632
00:57:31.360 --> 00:57:37.280
your hope to kind of then help
move forward psychiatry thinking to either include some
633
00:57:37.360 --> 00:57:40.280
of these frameworks or deeper frameworks,
like what might it look like? I
634
00:57:40.280 --> 00:57:44.159
guess, because I don't even know, right, I mean, I'm imagining
635
00:57:44.199 --> 00:57:46.280
going back to Freud's couch and psychoanalysis
to start, and then coming forward to
636
00:57:46.360 --> 00:57:49.639
still talking about that, and then
getting some meds as part of that.
637
00:57:49.800 --> 00:57:52.760
You can't get pretcribed cocaine anymore,
you know, but probably for the best,
638
00:57:52.400 --> 00:57:57.880
you know. Yes, an interesting
question about that of like where where
639
00:57:57.880 --> 00:58:00.440
where are we I guess, you
know, if we're in a less kind
640
00:58:00.440 --> 00:58:04.760
of evolved in medical state in this
perspective, like what where could we go?
641
00:58:04.800 --> 00:58:07.400
I guess. I'm curious, like, is it kind of more like
642
00:58:07.440 --> 00:58:08.960
threads in the brain to read the
neurology of what's happening, or like,
643
00:58:09.000 --> 00:58:12.559
what might that look like in your
in your view, well, I think
644
00:58:12.599 --> 00:58:16.360
that there. I think again,
your question is broad and there's several important
645
00:58:16.400 --> 00:58:24.119
different threads in it. One is, yes, there's been an increased medicalization
646
00:58:24.480 --> 00:58:32.119
of psychiatry, which has its benefits
and its disadvantages. Its benefits are that
647
00:58:32.480 --> 00:58:39.639
as the understanding of the brain advances, people who are in training in psychiatry
648
00:58:39.840 --> 00:58:46.519
are learning more about that. What's
bad is they're doing it at the expense
649
00:58:46.760 --> 00:58:54.480
of not learning psychotherapy. Current residents
in psychiatry have about twenty five percent of
650
00:58:54.519 --> 00:59:01.480
the training in psychotherapy that I had, and I became a psychoanalyst because in
651
00:59:01.519 --> 00:59:12.800
those days that was the most advanced
level of psychiatric training. But that had
652
00:59:13.519 --> 00:59:17.320
whether or not that should be the
same today as it was then, it
653
00:59:17.400 --> 00:59:23.679
had advantages to me because I really
learned how to listen, and learning to
654
00:59:23.840 --> 00:59:29.639
listen is such an important part of
all medical practice, you know, at
655
00:59:29.679 --> 00:59:34.159
the bedside manner, whereas and today
it's very hard to find a physician,
656
00:59:34.239 --> 00:59:39.360
forget about the chiatry, who will
spend forty five minutes with you taking a
657
00:59:39.400 --> 00:59:45.239
careful history and listening and going down
those rabbit holes where they're a question.
658
00:59:45.039 --> 00:59:50.880
It will be much closer to you
know, maybe putting a stethoscope on your
659
00:59:51.000 --> 00:59:55.079
shirt and you know, and not
even feeling your abdomen or looking in your
660
00:59:55.119 --> 01:00:00.960
ears or your mouth and saying,
well, let's go order tests. And
661
01:00:01.360 --> 01:00:07.679
that's also complicated because there are medical
legal reasons for that too. People are
662
01:00:07.679 --> 01:00:14.960
worried about being sued and they want
but it's often not a brain MRI that's
663
01:00:15.039 --> 01:00:22.000
needed. It's actually a sympathetic fear
that can help the person find their way
664
01:00:22.039 --> 01:00:25.039
through the forest they're stuck in at
the moment. And that is an important
665
01:00:25.079 --> 01:00:30.199
part of being a physician and certainly
important part of being a behavioral physician a
666
01:00:30.239 --> 01:00:34.920
psychiatrist. So but you know,
both are happening. The former head of
667
01:00:34.920 --> 01:00:40.519
the National Studentmental Health was a big
advocate for changing the nosology a diagnosis,
668
01:00:40.599 --> 01:00:47.719
to a biologically driven system the problem. And there are some very good researchers
669
01:00:47.760 --> 01:00:54.880
now at leading medical institutions in psychiatry
working on biomarkers, meaning what can we
670
01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:00.960
learn from things that we can test
for biologically that says this person is going
671
01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:05.639
to respond to prozac and this person
is not. They both have symptoms of
672
01:01:05.719 --> 01:01:12.840
depression. What's different in their chemistry, in their circuitry that makes one person
673
01:01:12.960 --> 01:01:17.079
respond and another So that we can
target our medicine to work better and ultimately
674
01:01:17.079 --> 01:01:21.840
so that we can understand what's going
on on a circuit level. You know,
675
01:01:22.199 --> 01:01:25.320
back in the one hundred years ago, it was areas of the brain.
676
01:01:25.440 --> 01:01:30.599
This area is involved with hearing.
In this area is that you know,
677
01:01:30.679 --> 01:01:37.840
a right or left brain with you
know, abstract in verbal things or
678
01:01:37.880 --> 01:01:44.440
with visual things, et cetera.
And the brain has been divided into sort
679
01:01:44.440 --> 01:01:49.079
of gross anatomy, but that's not
really the level in which things happen because
680
01:01:49.079 --> 01:01:53.960
all these parts connect and it's the
circuitary understanding that they're the key. That's
681
01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:57.559
a that's super fascinated I think for
walking through that too, because I think
682
01:01:57.559 --> 01:02:00.960
that that's a such an interesting point
that you know, I get also as
683
01:02:00.000 --> 01:02:05.519
a as a you know, as
a as a corollary that we often see
684
01:02:05.599 --> 01:02:08.360
in business that when we want to
do things like consumer research and understand you
685
01:02:08.360 --> 01:02:13.760
know, human behavior, in human
psychology and cognition, even if it's around
686
01:02:13.760 --> 01:02:16.800
the marketplace too, that there's a
kind of distrust of the ethnographic method,
687
01:02:16.840 --> 01:02:20.400
which you know comes from anthropology because
it takes a long time, because it's
688
01:02:20.480 --> 01:02:24.079
it's disciplined listening, right, and
it's a it's long engagement and sympathetic listening
689
01:02:24.199 --> 01:02:29.199
and kind of getting to know somebody's
worldview through engaging with them, versus like,
690
01:02:29.960 --> 01:02:30.719
you know, on an NPS,
you know, one out of ten
691
01:02:30.760 --> 01:02:35.679
score, how would you rate this
experience? You know, because it's like,
692
01:02:35.719 --> 01:02:37.559
how would you like if your wedding
was then like, oh yeah,
693
01:02:37.599 --> 01:02:38.960
well on a score from one to
ten, how was your wedding? You're
694
01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:43.760
like, uh, you know,
versus like let me, let's talk about
695
01:02:43.800 --> 01:02:45.079
that experience. You know. So
there is that interesting kind of back and
696
01:02:45.079 --> 01:02:49.639
forth as we think about the desire
for data right and and to your point,
697
01:02:49.679 --> 01:02:52.960
I think you also wisely said that
oftentimes, like organizations don't want to
698
01:02:52.960 --> 01:02:54.920
get sued, right, and so
having data saying well, we had this
699
01:02:55.039 --> 01:02:58.440
MRI that pointed this thing out.
Therefore we did the best we could in
700
01:02:58.559 --> 01:03:01.920
terms of having scientific data. Right. So it's actually we face a very
701
01:03:01.920 --> 01:03:07.880
similar challenge in terms of continuing to
promote the efficacy, you know, and
702
01:03:08.000 --> 01:03:13.880
value of sympathetic listening, right of
engaged conversation and getting to know someone and
703
01:03:13.960 --> 01:03:19.000
like listening to their history and their
associations as an important part of the subjective
704
01:03:19.039 --> 01:03:22.719
experience, right, But then also
it makes it adds I think some levels
705
01:03:22.719 --> 01:03:27.079
of important reality to also the objective
experience is weird? Does that that sounds
706
01:03:27.159 --> 01:03:29.360
right? Like? There is an
objective reality that the sky is a certain
707
01:03:29.599 --> 01:03:31.920
color, even though we might perceive
it all a little bit differently different state
708
01:03:31.920 --> 01:03:35.800
of blue right now, But there's
a chemical composition that does up there,
709
01:03:35.840 --> 01:03:37.079
right, And there may be some
chemicals in my brain or my eyes that
710
01:03:37.119 --> 01:03:42.440
make me see a certain shade versus
you. But you know, we can
711
01:03:42.920 --> 01:03:45.239
agree that the sky is blue,
you know, But then you know,
712
01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:49.800
being able to spend time talking about
what the blue sky might mean to somebody
713
01:03:49.920 --> 01:03:52.480
that might shape the way I'm perceiving
the world right now. It's an important
714
01:03:52.480 --> 01:03:55.119
part of what that is like.
So it's never just do I see,
715
01:03:55.559 --> 01:03:58.719
you know, this shade of blue, and you see that shade of blue,
716
01:03:58.719 --> 01:04:00.519
But it's also like, you know, what is what the sky or
717
01:04:00.519 --> 01:04:02.199
the stayer I mean to us in
a certain point. And I always find
718
01:04:02.360 --> 01:04:06.880
find that interesting to kind of,
uh, you know, think about what
719
01:04:06.920 --> 01:04:11.679
does this mean, as we need
in the science advances, as medicine advances,
720
01:04:11.719 --> 01:04:13.960
you know, how do we also
keep the human right, keep the
721
01:04:14.119 --> 01:04:16.559
the We're looking at human behavior to
keep that, keep that human right.
722
01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:19.000
It's one of those that maybe it's
just my just comfort of you know,
723
01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:21.199
I don't I don't. I don't
think we can be but also don't want
724
01:04:21.199 --> 01:04:25.320
to see us all reduced to like
you know, a circuit board, right,
725
01:04:26.760 --> 01:04:28.679
like turn the switch on, turn
that switch off, and then these
726
01:04:28.719 --> 01:04:30.800
genes on, those genes off,
and then you can either make me tall
727
01:04:30.880 --> 01:04:32.320
or shorter or what you know,
whatever it is, will be more likely
728
01:04:32.400 --> 01:04:38.000
to go be a policeman versus anthropologist
or something. But you know, there's
729
01:04:38.039 --> 01:04:40.000
there's more see that, there's more
to the box, I guess than that.
730
01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:43.719
But I think it's an interesting question
in this regardoons. So I'm getting
731
01:04:43.760 --> 01:04:47.239
us off into philosophy here, but
you know, I think there's good he
732
01:04:47.320 --> 01:04:49.760
is good. You know, yeah, that's some good good overlap in our
733
01:04:49.800 --> 01:04:54.320
thinking process. But I appreciate the
conversation so far, and I think just
734
01:04:54.360 --> 01:04:57.320
as as a kind of a wrap
wrap up point. You know, so
735
01:04:57.440 --> 01:05:01.639
you mentioned that there's you know,
sub tooth thousand certified forensic psychiatrists. But
736
01:05:01.639 --> 01:05:04.159
I think it's really it seems a
really interesting field. So I'd be curious
737
01:05:04.159 --> 01:05:06.280
just to hear a little bit about, you know, your organization and how
738
01:05:06.280 --> 01:05:09.639
you help folks kind of move into
that into that field, right so that
739
01:05:09.639 --> 01:05:11.920
they now I want to be a
psychiarist. But I didn't even realize that
740
01:05:11.960 --> 01:05:14.400
this is a career option. Some
folks might be saying, Hey, this
741
01:05:14.480 --> 01:05:16.039
sex year, this will be a
very cool blend that I'd love to see.
742
01:05:16.039 --> 01:05:18.840
So how does that work with your
with your organization? Yeah, thank
743
01:05:18.840 --> 01:05:25.559
you for asking that, because I'd
like to say a little bit about how
744
01:05:25.599 --> 01:05:28.960
we are organizing and what we do
and what my role is in that.
745
01:05:30.320 --> 01:05:34.679
We are one of as far as
I know, only two forensic psychiatric groups
746
01:05:34.719 --> 01:05:42.159
in the country, and I'm not
sure the ultimate the ultimate reasons for that,
747
01:05:42.280 --> 01:05:49.119
but they're Originally medicine general practice was
solo practice. It's all been consolidated
748
01:05:49.199 --> 01:05:56.800
now into group practice, multi specialty
practice, insurance company owned practices, hospital
749
01:05:56.840 --> 01:06:02.800
owned practices. That's been an evolution
of medical economics over of the course of
750
01:06:02.800 --> 01:06:14.079
my career. A last bastion of
solo practice for many years was clinical psychiatric
751
01:06:14.199 --> 01:06:20.519
and psychological practice. You know what's
now done by quote unquote therapists and even
752
01:06:20.679 --> 01:06:27.800
psychiatrists have moved into working in larger
groups, being employees and larger groups.
753
01:06:29.239 --> 01:06:35.920
Forensic psychiatry is a much younger subspecialty. The boards were only offered in the
754
01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:44.400
late nineties in forensic psychiatry, and
so those were psychiatrists who were interested in
755
01:06:44.440 --> 01:06:48.639
the interface of law and psychiatry and
got and made that gift, such as
756
01:06:48.639 --> 01:06:59.800
myself me, And so that was
a solo practice, solo practitioner profession and
757
01:07:00.280 --> 01:07:08.400
I just had the you know,
I don't know, perhaps entrepreneurial thought.
758
01:07:08.719 --> 01:07:15.199
When I was I had been on
the volunteer faculty at University California, San
759
01:07:15.199 --> 01:07:25.079
Francisco and now more recently also Stanford, and I was working teaching the fellows
760
01:07:25.119 --> 01:07:30.199
taking this one year fellowship in forensic
psychiatry. And I realized that I was,
761
01:07:30.440 --> 01:07:36.639
at that time, probably twenty five
years into my clinical practice. My
762
01:07:38.239 --> 01:07:43.519
brain was already slowing down, and
I had these really bright, really interesting
763
01:07:43.880 --> 01:07:49.000
young fellows, and I had an
abundance of referral So I thought, well,
764
01:07:49.039 --> 01:07:55.599
why not form a group with them
and share that? And I didn't
765
01:07:55.679 --> 01:08:00.519
at any to any extent then know
what I know now, which is excuse
766
01:08:00.599 --> 01:08:08.119
me. It's very difficult to get
started in forensic psychiatry. You don't generally
767
01:08:08.159 --> 01:08:15.319
yet have gray hair. The attorneys
are looking for gravitas in their experts.
768
01:08:15.760 --> 01:08:23.479
It's because of the theatrics as well
as whatever that may represent, and so
769
01:08:24.640 --> 01:08:29.319
by what has evolved now into actually
a whole system in our group. We
770
01:08:30.680 --> 01:08:34.119
have built our group to about thirty
two experts now, ten of whom are
771
01:08:34.279 --> 01:08:43.560
forensic neuropsychologists who do all the testing, and twenty two our Boorchuer divide forensic
772
01:08:43.560 --> 01:08:50.079
psychiatrists. But we build it primarily
by finding really the very best graduates of
773
01:08:50.199 --> 01:08:56.319
fellowships. You know, we have
a relationship with the directors of those fellowships,
774
01:08:56.880 --> 01:09:03.079
and they come in and very well
trained. They have been psychiatrists usually
775
01:09:03.079 --> 01:09:10.840
for five years or more, and
they've seen patients, but they have this
776
01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:14.960
threshold to cross in getting retained.
If they just go out on their own,
777
01:09:15.600 --> 01:09:17.640
it's very difficult because in the initial
interview, the attorney can say,
778
01:09:17.640 --> 01:09:24.960
well, how many cases have you
seen and been an expert in where a
779
01:09:25.079 --> 01:09:31.159
woman has been harassed by her boss
and sexually propositioned, and their answer is
780
01:09:31.199 --> 01:09:36.880
invariably no, not that that's a
rare phenomena, but they haven't been practicing
781
01:09:36.960 --> 01:09:45.039
long enough to acquire this. So
in addition to mentoring, just because I've
782
01:09:45.079 --> 01:09:49.439
been down the road more than they
have, I often get on that phone
783
01:09:49.479 --> 01:09:57.680
call with them in the background and
can convey to the attorney that they're a
784
01:09:57.720 --> 01:10:00.439
member of a team. In the
team, we have, you know,
785
01:10:00.800 --> 01:10:08.640
hundreds of years of experience and sub
sub specialty experts. We have you know,
786
01:10:10.159 --> 01:10:14.720
now half a dozen people who also
have boards in psychiatry, forensic psychiatry
787
01:10:14.760 --> 01:10:19.079
and child adolescents psychiatry, or boards
in substance abuse and addiction medicine, or
788
01:10:19.159 --> 01:10:24.840
boards in neuropsychiatry, whatever. So
if they have any questions, there are
789
01:10:24.840 --> 01:10:28.720
people they can call upon. I'll
be in the background, and that usually
790
01:10:28.720 --> 01:10:34.680
reassures I didn't know it would,
but it usually reassures the attorney that they
791
01:10:34.680 --> 01:10:40.439
don't just have this young wet behind
the ear as a person they're relying on.
792
01:10:41.079 --> 01:10:46.319
But they come with a lot of
backing up, and that's been very
793
01:10:46.359 --> 01:10:49.880
helpful because then they get the two
or three cases under their belt and they're
794
01:10:49.880 --> 01:10:54.560
off to the rage. Just because
they're smart and they're great communicators. Our
795
01:10:55.479 --> 01:11:00.399
profession, what we sell is the
ability to communicate. You know, it's
796
01:11:00.439 --> 01:11:04.960
important to have the training, but
you know, a CV curriculum VITI that
797
01:11:05.079 --> 01:11:11.079
looks like an old fashioned telephone book
doesn't do it if you're a pompous jerk
798
01:11:11.560 --> 01:11:14.880
when you're communicating with a jury or
whatever. You need to be able to
799
01:11:15.560 --> 01:11:20.039
use simple, understandable language and talk
about abstract phenomena in concrete ways and lots
800
01:11:20.079 --> 01:11:26.960
of stuff like that. Because where
a team, we have the ability to
801
01:11:27.079 --> 01:11:32.359
handle multi plaintiff cases, and that's
been really evolving as especialty for our group.
802
01:11:33.079 --> 01:11:42.079
So we get retained when there's been
a say, an industrial explosion,
803
01:11:42.279 --> 01:11:48.319
and there are many plaintiffs who have
been in subsequent lawsuits. We get retained
804
01:11:48.399 --> 01:11:53.800
if there's been someone's quote unquote gone
postal and there's been a shooting in a
805
01:11:53.840 --> 01:12:00.439
workplace and people have been killed and
other people traumatized by this, and there's
806
01:12:00.520 --> 01:12:08.840
civil litigation after that, so that
say, the widows and family members children
807
01:12:08.880 --> 01:12:14.680
of the decedents may be suing for
a loss of spoused, loss of parent,
808
01:12:14.880 --> 01:12:20.199
emotional damages, and others who were
in the scene of the of the
809
01:12:20.279 --> 01:12:27.800
accident or of the shooting are also
suing for the emotional damages and being traumatized
810
01:12:27.800 --> 01:12:34.680
by that, and that's a whole
different I call that. It's like it's
811
01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:40.399
the logistics are very complicated. It's
like turning you know, an aircraft carrier.
812
01:12:40.600 --> 01:12:44.199
You don't do it on a dime. There are so many moving parts.
813
01:12:44.239 --> 01:12:46.359
But we've been down that road a
lot of times and have a fair
814
01:12:46.359 --> 01:12:50.520
amount of experience and it so that's
a whole other interesting dimension that has evolved
815
01:12:51.560 --> 01:12:58.960
accidentally from becoming a group. Are
also this I'm very proud of exceedingly diverse,
816
01:13:00.159 --> 01:13:05.199
not just gender but ethnic race.
And we didn't in any way consciously
817
01:13:05.239 --> 01:13:10.760
build that, but it came from
looking for really good people and they brought
818
01:13:10.760 --> 01:13:16.039
with them different ethnicities. So I
really, really I'm proud of that aspect
819
01:13:16.119 --> 01:13:19.119
of our group. Yeah, that's
great. I think that that's such a
820
01:13:19.159 --> 01:13:26.800
fascinating arena. And I appreciate the
idea too that a lot of this work
821
01:13:27.199 --> 01:13:31.279
on one level is translation, right, It's like translating the requirements to legal
822
01:13:31.279 --> 01:13:33.800
worlds, but how to communicate that
and be a good communicator, And it's
823
01:13:33.800 --> 01:13:36.439
like it's a fundamental skill that the
world needs. And then it's like then
824
01:13:36.479 --> 01:13:42.079
you add the extra layer there in
terms of subspecialties in psychiatry and legal practice,
825
01:13:42.119 --> 01:13:45.119
and it's like you got to you
gotta a wizbang combo there right that
826
01:13:45.119 --> 01:13:48.760
that we need in terms of how
do we actually bring those conversations to bear.
827
01:13:48.840 --> 01:13:53.680
So really excited and enthused by by
the work and excited to have folks
828
01:13:53.760 --> 01:13:56.520
check out the organization and all the
other good stuff that you are doing.
829
01:13:56.520 --> 01:13:59.159
And of course I doubt people are
listening to this to necessarily saying, hey,
830
01:13:59.199 --> 01:14:01.560
I need to go find one,
go find a forensic psychiatist. But
831
01:14:01.640 --> 01:14:05.359
if you need to, we got
the guy for you right here, sir,
832
01:14:05.439 --> 01:14:08.000
that could be the way. But
thank you so much for joining me
833
01:14:08.039 --> 01:14:10.520
on the podcast today, Mark and
sharing your thoughts has been been a great
834
01:14:10.520 --> 01:14:14.479
conversation. It's a pleasure, Adam. I've really enjoyed talking with you.
835
01:14:14.600 --> 01:14:17.359
And that's a wrap on today's deep
dive into the nuances and intricacies of forensic
836
01:14:17.359 --> 01:14:20.560
psychiatry with doctor Mark Levy. A
huge thank you once again to Mark.
837
01:14:20.600 --> 01:14:23.880
We're joining me on the podcast.
You know, it's clear there's a whole
838
01:14:23.880 --> 01:14:27.560
world where the mind meets the law, and that's filled with stories of challenge
839
01:14:27.600 --> 01:14:30.039
and transformation and the pursuit of truth. And whether you're thinking about the ethics
840
01:14:30.039 --> 01:14:34.640
of medicalization, what it means to
work as or with a forensic psychiatrist or
841
01:14:34.640 --> 01:14:39.560
expert in the courtroom, or you're
just simply intrigued by the human stories that
842
01:14:39.600 --> 01:14:43.359
are behind the cases. Remember the
importance of communication and the role that we
843
01:14:43.439 --> 01:14:46.000
all play in understanding each other's realities. As always, I'd love to hear
844
01:14:46.039 --> 01:14:49.159
from you your thoughts, comments,
questions from this episodes. You can get
845
01:14:49.159 --> 01:14:53.600
in touch on social media or over
email. And thank you as always for
846
01:14:53.640 --> 01:14:57.279
tuning in and until next time,
keep thinking deeply and look beyond the surface.
847
01:14:57.720 --> 01:15:00.760
I'm Adam Gamwell and this is this
Anthra life. We'll see you next time.

Forensic Psychiatrist
Dr. Levy attended Durham University, U.K. (1965-66) and is a graduate of Columbia College (A.B. 1967), the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons (M.D. 1971) in New York as well as the San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute (1984) in San Francisco. He currently practices clinical and forensic psychiatry, licensed as a Physician and Surgeon since 1972 by the State of California and since 2004 by the State of Hawaii.
He was certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology in Psychiatry (1981) and Forensic Psychiatry (1999, recertified in 2009, 2019). In addition, he was certified by the National Board of Physicians and Surgeons in both Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry (2019).
He is currently an Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry in the School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, where has been on the faculty since 1977 and since 2000 has taught in the Law and Psychiatry Fellowship. He is also on the Faculty of the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis and is the Founder and former Chairman and President of the San Francisco Foundation for Psychoanalysis, a community service outreach organization. He is now also Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychiatry Stanford University School of Medicine.
Since 1975, Dr. Levy has been in full-time private practice, originally of psychiatry and beginning in the 1980’s of psychoanalysis and forensic psychiatry as well. He has been retained as a forensic psychiatric expert in more than 500 civil lawsuits and related matters. He has testified in State and Feder…Read More








































